← 返回月老筆記
🫂❤️ 關係經營

「我冇安全感」—你係邊種依戀? 愛情顧問解說

2026-09-10
🌐 English version

"I Don't Feel Secure" — Which Attachment Style Are You? — A Love Advisor Explains

Introduction

"Do you not love me anymore?"

How many times have Hong Kong couples said this line? Your boyfriend takes three hours to reply on WhatsApp, and you've already scripted an entire drama in your head: Is he talking to someone else? Is he starting to find me annoying? Are we about to break up?

You think you simply "lack a sense of security" — but have you ever wondered why, in the very same relationship, one person can feel completely at ease while another worries day in and day out?

Psychology has an answer: a big part of your "sense of security" was decided long before you ever started dating.

Attachment Theory: Your Blueprint for Love Was Drawn in Childhood

In the 1950s, British psychologist John Bowlby introduced Attachment Theory. He found that the patterns of interaction between an infant and their caregiver become internalised into an "internal working model" that we unconsciously carry into our intimate relationships as adults.

Simply put: the way you were loved as a child is the way you love as an adult.

In romantic relationships, this pattern roughly breaks down into three styles:

The Anxious Style: The One Who Chases

  • Fears their partner doesn't love them and needs constant reassurance
  • Demands instant replies, checks their partner's phone, and loves to "test" them
  • The moment their partner goes cold, they spiral into panic: "They don't want me anymore."

The anxious style usually traces back to a caregiver whose love was "on and off" — sometimes warm and affectionate, sometimes distant. That inconsistency taught you one thing: "You have to hold on tight to love, or it will slip away."

So as an adult, you're not "too clingy" — you're re-enacting that childhood fear of being abandoned.

The Avoidant Style: The One Who Gets Chased

  • Fears getting too close — the more their partner leans in, the more they want to pull away
  • Champions "independence," and dislikes checking in or sharing feelings
  • At the first sign of conflict wants to "take a breather" — when really they want to escape

The avoidant style usually traces back to a childhood of being told to "be good, be independent, don't rely on others." They learned: "Depending on people is dangerous; only relying on yourself is safe."

So as an adult, it's not that you "don't love them" — you're afraid of that suffocating feeling of being needed and depended on.

The Secure Style: The Steady One

  • Trusts their partner without losing themselves
  • Can be close and independent at the same time
  • Can talk through conflict honestly without losing control

These are the people we call "secure." The love they received as children was stable and reliable, so they don't need to hold on for dear life — and they don't need to run away.

Anxious × Avoidant: The Most Common Painful Pairing

Here's a cruel truth: the anxious and the avoidant are constantly drawn to each other.

When the anxious type meets the avoidant type, they think, "They're so charming, so independent, so hard to pin down" — that feeling of "not being able to catch them" triggers exactly the feeling you knew as a child. When the avoidant type meets the anxious type, they think, "They're so passionate, so devoted, so in need of me" — that feeling of "being needed" temporarily fills the emptiness inside them.

But once they're together, it's a disaster:

  • The more the anxious partner leans in, the more suffocated the avoidant partner feels, and the more they want to run
  • The more the avoidant partner runs, the more panicked the anxious partner gets, and the harder they chase
  • Until one cries "You don't love me" and the other cries "You won't give me any space"

Psychology calls this cycle the "anxious-avoidant trap."

Here's the key point: in this trap, no one is the bad guy. Both people are unconsciously re-enacting their childhood wounds — one protects themselves by chasing, the other by running.

Three Signs You Don't Have Enough Security

① Checking Their Phone and Location

The stated reason: "I just want to know if they're lying to me."

The real fear: "I don't believe I deserve to be loved, so I look for proof that they'll leave me."

The problem is, if you check their phone and find nothing, you won't feel relieved (you'll just think you "haven't found it yet"). If you do find something, you'll be even more devastated. Either way, you lose.

② Demanding Instant Replies

The stated reason: "It's about respect — how hard is it to reply to a message?"

The real fear: "I need to confirm every moment that you're still here. If you reply one second late, it means you might have left."

The problem is, you're not asking for "respect" — you're asking for a "guarantee." But no one in love can give you a 100% guarantee. Even if they reply instantly, you'll eventually find something else to be afraid of.

③ Constantly Testing Your Partner

Throwing tantrums out of nowhere, suddenly threatening to break up, deliberately not replying to see if they'll come coax you back — these are all "tests."

The stated reason: "I want to know how much they love me."

The real fear: "I don't believe they love me, so I need them to prove it over and over."

The problem is that testing can become addictive. This time they coax you back; next time you'll need them to try even harder — until one day they're exhausted and actually leave. Then you'll say, "See? I knew they'd leave" — but you didn't "predict it coming true," you personally pushed them into making it happen.

Their Responsibility vs. Your Own Work

Let's be clear here, because a lot of people hear "you have to build your own security" and misunderstand it as "so the other person doesn't have to do anything." That's completely wrong.

In a healthy relationship, your partner does have responsibilities:

  • Consistency and reliability: do what you say you'll do, and don't swing between hot and cold
  • Transparency: no need for secrecy — give the other person peace of mind
  • Respect for your feelings: even if they think you're "overthinking," they shouldn't brush you off with a simple "you're overthinking it"

But you also have your own work to do:

Even if your partner does all of the above, if you're anxious by nature, you'll still find something to fear. Because the root of "not feeling secure" isn't "they don't do enough" — it's "I don't believe I deserve to be loved."

This is a cruel but crucial distinction: half of your sense of security comes from your partner, and the other half is something you have to forge yourself. If you stake 100% of it on the other person, you'll never feel safe — because you don't even trust yourself.

Five Ways to Forge Your Own Sense of Security

1. Know Your Own Attachment Style

Once you know you're anxious, the next time you feel afraid, a little voice can remind you: "Wait — this might just be my pattern, not something that's actually happening." That awareness alone is the first step to change.

2. Stop Testing, Just Ask

If you want to know whether they love you, just ask: "I'm feeling a bit unsettled today — can you tell me you're still here?" — instead of "testing" them with tantrums and break-up threats.

Remember: the "coaxing" you get from testing will diminish over time. The communication you get from honesty is what actually accumulates.

3. Build Your Self-Worth

The underlying logic of security is: "Without them, I can still live well" — not "without them, I'll die."

So build a life of your own — work, friends, interests, goals. The bigger your world, the healthier the proportion of love within it, and the less you'll feel the world spin over a single sentence from one person.

4. Express Your Needs Directly, Don't Make Them Guess

"I'd like you to reply faster, because I get worried" — that solves a problem.

"Do you not love me anymore?" — that creates one.

The former gives your partner something concrete to act on; the latter only makes them defensive, dismissive, or resentful.

5. Practise Self-Soothing

When anxiety surges, ask yourself two questions first:

  • "What are the facts?" (They haven't replied in three hours. The fact is "they haven't replied" — not "they're talking to someone else.")
  • "What am I afraid of?" (You're afraid of "being abandoned," not "this specific thing.")

Separate the facts from the fear, and the intensity of your anxiety will drop by half on the spot.

Closing Thoughts

A sense of security doesn't fall from the sky, and it's not a gift your partner hands you. It's an understanding the two of you build together — they do their part (reliability, transparency, respect), and you do yours (self-worth, honest communication, self-soothing).

If you keep going round in circles in the "chase and run" cycle until you're both exhausted, why not talk to a LoveWise love advisor? Find out which attachment style each of you is, and how to break out of the loop together.

Talk to a LoveWise love advisor — we're always here to talk 💕

引言

「你係咪唔愛我喇?」

呢句說話,香港嘅情侶講過幾多次?男朋友遲咗三個鐘覆 WhatsApp,你已經喺腦入面寫咗成個劇本:佢係咪同緊第二個傾偈?佢係咪開始嫌我煩?我哋係咪就嚟散?

你以為自己係「冇安全感」,但係你有冇諗過—點解同一段關係,有人可以完全唔擔心,有人就日日提心吊膽?

心理學有個講法:你嘅「安全感」水平,早喺你仲未識拍拖嗰陣,已經決定咗一大半。

依附理論:你嘅愛情藍圖,細個已經畫好

英國心理學家 John Bowlby 喺 1950 年代提出依附理論(Attachment Theory)。佢發現,嬰兒同照顧者之間嘅互動模式,會內化成一種「內在運作模式」,長大之後不自覺咁帶入親密關係。

簡單講:你細個點樣被愛,長大就點樣去愛人。

呢套模式,落到愛情入面,大致分三種:

焦慮型:追住人嗰個

  • 驚對方唔愛自己,需要不斷確認
  • 要人秒回、查手機、鍾意「測試」對方
  • 對方一冷落,就陷入恐慌:「佢唔要我了」

焦慮型嘅根源,通常係細個時照顧者嘅愛「時有時冇」—有時好錫你,有時又冷落你。呢種唔穩定,令你學識咗一樣嘢:「愛要用力抓緊,唔抓就會走。」

所以長大之後,你唔係「太癡身」,你係喺度重演細個嗰種「怕被丟下」嘅恐慌。

迴避型:俾人追嗰個

  • 怕太親密,對方越想近,佢越想逃
  • 標榜「獨立」,唔鍾意報到、唔鍾意傾心事
  • 一有衝突就想「冷靜下」—其實係想逃走

迴避型嘅根源,通常係細個被要求「要乖、要獨立、唔好依賴人」。佢哋學識咗:「靠人係危險嘅,靠自己先安全。」

所以長大之後,你唔係「唔愛佢」,你係怕咗嗰種「被人需要、被人依賴」嘅窒息感。

安全型:穩定嗰個

  • 信任對方,同時唔會失去自己
  • 可以親密,亦可以獨立
  • 有衝突可以坦誠傾,唔會失控

呢種人,就係大家口中「有安全感」嘅人。佢哋細個得到嘅愛係穩定同可靠嘅,所以佢哋唔需要用力抓緊,亦唔需要拼命逃走。

焦慮 × 迴避:最常見嘅痛苦組合

有個好殘酷嘅事實:焦慮型同迴避型,成日互相吸引。

焦慮型見到迴避型,會覺得「佢好有魅力、好獨立、好有距離感」—嗰種「捉唔住」嘅感覺,正正勾起你細個嘅熟悉感。迴避型見到焦慮型,會覺得「佢好熱情、好投入、好需要我」—嗰種「被需要」嘅感覺,暫時填補咗佢內心嘅空虛。

但係一齊之後,就係災難:

  • 焦慮型越想靠近,迴避型越覺得窒息,越想逃
  • 迴避型越想逃,焦慮型越恐慌,追得更緊
  • 最後一個喊「你唔愛我」,一個喊「你唔俾空間我」

呢個循環,心理學叫「焦慮-迴避陷阱」(Anxious-Avoidant Trap)。

重點係:呢個陷阱入面,冇人係壞人。 兩個人都係喺度不自覺咁重演自己細個嘅傷,只係一個用「追」嚟保護自己,一個用「逃」嚟保護自己。

安全感唔夠嘅 3 個表現

① 查手機、查定位

表面理由:「我想知佢有冇呃我。」

真正心聲:「我唔信自己值得被愛,所以我要搵證據證明佢會離開我。」

問題係:查手機查唔到嘢,你唔會安心(你只會覺得「未查到」);查到嘢,你更加崩潰。無論結果點,你都輸。

② 要人秒回

表面理由:「尊重我啫,覆個 message 有幾難?」

真正心聲:「我要時刻確認你仲喺度,你遲覆一秒,就代表你可能走咗。」

問題係:你唔係要「尊重」,你要嘅係「保證」。但係愛情冇人可以俾到 100% 嘅保證,就算對方秒回,你遲早會搵到第二樣嘢嚟驚。

③ 不斷測試對方

無啦啦發脾氣、突然講分手、故意唔覆佢睇佢會唔會哄返你—呢啲都係「測試」。

表面理由:「我想知佢有幾愛我。」

真正心聲:「我唔信佢愛我,所以我要佢不斷證明。」

問題係:測試係會「測試上癮」嘅。今次佢哄返你,下次你會要佢哄得更用力,直到有一日佢攰咗、真係走,你就會話「睇啦,我早就知佢會走」—你唔係「預言成真」,你係「親手逼佢實現」。

對方嘅責任 vs 你嘅課題

呢度要講清楚,因為好多人一聽到「安全感要自己建立」,就誤會係「咁即係對方可以乜都唔使做」。錯晒。

一段健康關係入面,對方有責任做嘅嘢:

  • 一致同可靠:講過嘅嘢要做到,唔好一時熱情一時冷淡
  • 透明:唔使遮遮掩掩,俾到人安心
  • 尊重你嘅感受:就算佢覺得你「諗多咗」,都唔應該一句「你諗多咗」打發你

但係,你都有你自己嘅課題:

就算對方做晒以上全部,如果你本身係焦慮型,你都會搵到嘢嚟驚。因為「冇安全感」嘅根源,唔係「佢做唔夠」,而係「我唔信自己值得被愛」。

呢個係一個好殘酷但好重要嘅分別:安全感有一半係對方俾嘅,有一半係要你自己煉嘅。 如果將 100% 都押喺對方身上,你永遠都唔會覺得安全—因為你連自己都唔信。

5 個方法,煉成你嘅安全感

1. 認識自己嘅依戀類型

知道自己係焦慮型,你下一次驚嗰陣,就會有個聲音提醒你:「等等,呢個可能係我嘅模式,唔係真係有嘢發生。」—呢個「覺察」,本身就係改變嘅第一步。

2. 停止測試,直接問

想知佢愛唔愛你,直接問:「我今日有啲唔安,可唔可以話我知你仲喺度?」—而唔好用發脾氣、講分手去「試」。

記住:測試換嚟嘅「哄」,係會遞減嘅。坦誠換嚟嘅「溝通」,先會累積。

3. 建立自我價值

安全感嘅底層邏輯係:「冇咗佢,我都可以好好生活」,而唔係「冇咗佢,我會死」。

所以,發展你自己嘅生活—工作、朋友、興趣、目標。你嘅世界越大,愛情喺入面嘅比例就越健康,你就越唔會因為一個人嘅一句說話而天旋地轉。

4. 直接表達需要,唔好叫人估

「我想你覆我快啲,因為我會擔心」—呢句係解決問題。

「你係咪唔愛我?」—呢句係製造問題。

前者俾咗對方一個具體可以做嘅嘢;後者只會令對方防禦、否認、或者反感。

5. 練習自我安撫

焦慮湧上嚟嗰陣,先問自己兩個問題:

  • 「事實係咩?」(佢三個鐘冇覆,事實係「佢未覆」,唔係「佢同緊第二個傾偈」)
  • 「我驚嘅係咩?」(你驚嘅係「被拋棄」,唔係「呢件事本身」)

將「事實」同「恐懼」分開,你焦慮嘅強度會即刻跌一半。

結尾

安全感唔係天上跌落嚟,亦唔係對方送俾你嘅一份禮物。佢係你哋兩個人一齊練出嚟嘅默契—佢做佢嗰份(可靠、透明、尊重),你做你嗰份(自我價值、坦誠溝通、自我安撫)。

如果你哋成日喺「追同逃」嘅循環入面轉圈,轉到大家都攰晒,不妨搵 LoveWise 嘅愛情顧問傾下。睇下你哋各自係邊種依戀,點樣一齊跳出呢個圈。

搵 LoveWise 嘅愛情顧問傾下,一齊拆解你哋嘅相處模式 💕

📖 相關文章

💕 需要人傾下偈?

無論係感情煩惱定係想搵人傾下,LoveWise 嘅顧問隨時喺度陪你。

免費開始傾 →